Musk-led investors push for OpenAI control with a $97.4 billion acquisition offer
Elon Musk's consortium offers an unsolicited bid worth has made an unprecedented multi-billion-dollar offer seeking to regain control of OpenAI and shift its focus back to open-source development and AI safety.
![Power, artificial intelligence, and billions at stake—Musk challenges OpenAI’s direction with massive offer. Photo: Inc. Magazine Power, artificial intelligence, and billions at stake—Musk challenges OpenAI’s direction with massive offer. Photo: Inc. Magazine](https://imgmedia.larepublica.pe/640x371/uslarepublica/original/2025/02/10/67aa80d78d24644cf6269419.webp)
Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, has made a bold move by submitting a $97.4 billion unsolicited bid to acquire OpenAI's nonprofit division. The offer aims to redirect the company’s focus towards open-source development and ensuring artificial intelligence safety. This move has introduced a new chapter in the ongoing disagreement between Musk and OpenAI's CEO, Sam Altman, about the organization's direction.
OpenAI, co-founded by Musk and Altman in 2015, started as a nonprofit with the goal of developing benefits to humanity. However, under Sam’s leadership, it transitioned into a for-profit model to secure significant investments, with a recent funding round valuing the company at $157 billion. This transition has led to criticism from Musk, who believes automatic technology has strayed from its original mission.
Musk’s proposal and vision for OpenAI
Musk’s proposal, supported by his AI venture xAI and other investors, seeks to restore Open artificial intelligence’s focus on its core principles. The bid calls for a return to open-source initiatives and emphasizes the importance of AI safety. Musk has voiced concerns that commercialization could undermine ethical considerations and its commitment to the responsible development of AI technology.
In a statement, Musk explained that his acquisition proposal aims to keep OpenAI aligned with its mission to develop telemechanics responsibly and ensure it serves humanity's best interests. His vision centers on advancing AI while maintaining ethical standards in its creation and deployment.
Altman’s response and legal tensions
Sam Altman has rejected Musk's acquisition offer, responding with a comment suggesting Musk should focus on buying Twitter instead. This response highlights the growing tension between the two leaders, and their disagreement has now entered the legal arena. Musk accuses OpenAI of abandoning its nonprofit roots, while Altman defends the company’s shift as a necessary step to secure resources for large-scale AI research.
Altman argues that OpenAI’s transition to a for-profit model was crucial for attracting the funding needed to scale automatic technology projects. He believes this approach enables electronic communication to pursue ambitious goals without compromising its core values, despite Musk’s ongoing criticisms.
![A battle for AI´s future. Musk and Altman clash over over OpenAI´s direction and control. Photo: NBC News A battle for AI´s future. Musk and Altman clash over over OpenAI´s direction and control. Photo: NBC News](https://imgmedia.larepublica.pe/640x374/uslarepublica/original/2025/02/10/67aa820cdc93420f8f5feb1e.webp)
A battle for AI´s future. Musk and Altman clash over over OpenAI´s direction and control. Photo: NBC News
Impact on the future of AI development and ethical standards
Musk’s acquisition offer carries significant implications for the AI industry. If successful, it could set a new precedent for balancing profit with ethical responsibility in artificial intelligence development. The outcome of this conflict may affect how future AI collaborations are structured and how companies address both commercial and ethical concerns in their strategies.
Industry experts suggest that Musk’s push for a more ethical AI framework could influence future regulations and standards for expert system research and deployment. The ongoing dispute brings to light the importance of aligning innovation with societal values and ensuring that technology development prioritizes safety alongside progress.